Token Bounty Campaign

Koinomo Social, Article & Signature Bounty | 200,000 KMO

Completed · Launched 2021-08-20 · Ended 2023-09-21

I managed Koinomo’s four-week bounty programme across social promotion, articles and forum signatures. The campaign allocated 200,000 KMO tokens, which I held for the planned reward distribution, with weekly forms used to collect participant reports.

The client’s goal

Koinomo wanted to introduce its digital asset-management concept to cryptocurrency audiences and build participation in its official communities. The programme combined social outreach, explanatory articles and signature advertising to support broader project awareness.

The approach

I structured the campaign around Friday-to-Thursday activity weeks and a recurring Google Forms reporting process. Participants needed to follow the project’s Twitter account, subscribe to its Telegram channel and join its Reddit community. A reporting infographic explained the submission timeline and weekly requirements.

What I managed

I coordinated campaign instructions, registration requirements, weekly reporting and participant communication. I also held the bounty tokens for distribution; the announced arrangement required Koinomo’s team to provide BNB for transaction fees. Participants were instructed to supply their own non-custodial BEP20 addresses.

Results and evidence

The announcement documents a four-week programme with a 200,000 KMO allocation and distribution scheduled for two weeks after the bounty ended. It also records that the reward tokens were already in my custody.

The supplied forum dates span August 20, 2021, to November 21, 2023. That longer thread record does not represent continuous campaign activity. The available information confirms the announced structure and token-holding arrangement, but does not establish final distribution totals or participant numbers.

Campaign details

Holding the reward tokens made this campaign’s funding arrangement a distinct part of the management process. The token allocation was already with me, while the network fees remained the team’s responsibility before distribution could proceed.

Clear wallet instructions were equally important. Requiring a personal BEP20 address helped participants understand where their rewards were intended to go, while the requirement to retain published work preserved submissions for review through the payment stage.

Campaign reference 1 ↗

Discuss a similar campaign ↗

View my forum portfolio ↗