Token Bounty Campaign
CoinChum Social Bounty Campaign | $48,000 CHUM Allocation
Completed · Launched 2021-07-08 · Ended 2021-08-05
I managed CoinChum’s four-week social bounty campaign across Facebook, Twitter and Telegram in July–August 2021. The programme advertised a $48,000 allocation in CHUM tokens and included weekly reporting, participant coordination and follow-up on missing or partial rewards.
The client’s goal
CoinChum wanted to build awareness of its peer-to-peer cryptocurrency marketplace and attract people to its official communities. The campaign combined social content with participation in its Twitter and Telegram channels to introduce the project to potential users.The approach
I organised activity into four weekly reporting periods, running from July 9 to August 5, 2021. Participants submitted their completed tasks through weekly Google Forms. Proof of registration, official channel membership and a fixed BEP20 wallet address formed the basic participation requirements.What I managed
I coordinated campaign instructions, weekly report collection, participant records and community questions. After payment discrepancies were reported, I introduced a separate claims form so eligible participants could identify unpaid rewards or outstanding balances against the campaign spreadsheet.Results and evidence
The campaign record spans July 8 to August 22, 2021, including four scheduled activity weeks and a subsequent payment update. The announced reward pool was valued at $48,000 in CHUM tokens; this was a token allocation rather than confirmed cash expenditure.The August update documented a process for reporting missing or partial payments, with an August 28 submission deadline. It demonstrates payment follow-up, but does not establish that every outstanding reward was ultimately settled.
Campaign details
The work continued beyond the promotional period. When the team asked which participants had not received their full rewards, I gave members a clear process for checking their eligibility and reporting the exact balance owed.Claims had to match the approved spreadsheet and use the original payment address. This helped distinguish outstanding rewards from ineligible or inaccurate submissions and gave the team an organised record to investigate.